.png)
Selected References
01 / FOR WHOM
Who is this service for
Wikipedia does not distinguish based on revenue or industry. It distinguishes based on whether someone else has written about you independently and in depth. These three groups most often meet that criterion.
Group A
Companies and brands
Companies that have been featured in both industry specific, national media and editorial articles. Typically, these are companies with a long history, a distinctive product, or a demonstrable influence in the industry.
Group B
Founders / management
People whose names appear on their own, not just in a quote in a company press release. Known figure in interviews, profiles, expert commentary, and awards.
Group C
Public figures
Authors, athletes, scientists, artists, and public figures who have been the subject of long-term independent coverage.
What we don't do
Wikipedia is not a PR channel or a tool for reputation management. We do not rewrite well-sourced critical information, and we do not take on commissions aimed at removing facts from the encyclopedia.
This isn’t just us being cautious. It’s the way the encyclopedia works - and the only reason it holds the significance it does.
"Almost 48% of ChatGPT’s answers are based on Wikipedia. It is the ultimate seal of legitimacy for investors, partners, and algorithms alike. Without it, you simply don't exist."
02 / TERMS
What determines whether a page can be created
The most common reason for deletion isn't poor writing. It's a topic that should never have had its own article in the first place. That's why we start with sources and ask ourselves four questions before we even touch the keyboard.
Criterion 01
Significance
Have credible sources addressed the topic independently and in depth? Not a mere mention or a catalog entry. A genuine treatment of the subject.
Criterion 02
Independence
Were the best sources created without your influence? A source you helped create does not demonstrate significance.
Criterion 03
Verifiability
Can every claim be traced back to a published source? Anything that cannot be substantiated does not belong in an encyclopedia.
Criterion 04
Neutrality
Do the available sources support a balanced text including information you would not include in your own presentation?
What usually works as a source
+ Editorial articles in established media outlets
+ Industry and professional journals
+ Books, professional publications, academic texts
+ Reports from independent institutions
+ Reputable international coverage
What's usually not enough
− Paid and sponsored articles, PR pieces
− Press releases and verbatim reprints thereof
− Company website, blog, and social media
− Company catalogs and business directories
− Brief mentions without separate coverage of the topic
The line between editorial and sponsored content isn't always clear at first glance. Evaluating individual sources is part of our job. For more details, see the guide on which sources Wikipedia actually accepts.
OUR GUARANTEES
If an article is deleted within 30 days of publication, you won't be charged for creating it.
We aren't paid to try something. We're paid to make sure it works.
03 / When sources Are Insufficient
A lack of sources doesn't have to mean the end of the project
Most companies have more independent coverage than they realize—they just don’t know about it. So first, we look for what’s already been published: archives, industry publications, foreign media, and specialized articles. Only when this research proves insufficient do we take the second approach: we leverage our contacts at newsrooms and try to pitch the company’s story for publication.
Step 01
Map of missing coverage
What exactly is missing for the topic to warrant a standalone article—and whether that’s realistically achievable.
Step 03
Editorial topics
Data, expertise, and stories that have real news value. Not corporate news.
Step 03
Contacting newsrooms
Our team reaches out to specific journalists and editorial teams with whom we have long-standing relationships and whose work is usable on Wikipedia.
We don't pay newsrooms
You pay us for preparing the source material, selecting topics, and facilitating contact - not for publication. That is precisely why the result can be truly independent coverage.
Neither a paid nor a sponsored article establishes encyclopedic notability, and neither can be used as evidence of notability. That is why we do not offer them.
04 / Process
Free Notability & Authority Audit
We perform a strict internal QA check before we even start to ensure your brand meets Wikipedia's criteria.
Proactive Weekly Updates
You will receive weekly progress reports so you never have to wonder where your draft stands.
The 30-Minute Welcome Call
We gather the basic facts in one short meeting. After this, you do not lift a finger.
Post-Launch Monitoring
Once live, we actively monitor your page, helping it stay up and professionally arguing any changes with Wikipedia editors on your behalf.
Done-For-You Sourcing & Drafting
We handle 100% of the complex historical research, PR link sourcing, and editorial writing.
05 / Guides
If you'd like to go into more detail
Three articles that will give you the answer even without our help. If, after reading them, you decide you can handle it on your own, we’ll consider that a success.
The 30-Day Guarantee: If your Wikipedia article is deleted within the first 30 days of going live, you pay absolutely nothing.
Dominate Generative AI and Claim Your Status as the Unquestionable Market Leader
In the era of Generative AI, traditional SEO is no longer enough. You need to become the source data that AI learns from and confidently recommends as its #1 answer.
Why Wikipedia is Your Ultimate Unfair Advantage
While your competitors burn capital on ads fighting for search rankings, you can become the very definition of your industry. A Wikipedia page isn't just text, it is your VIP passport to the big leagues.
-
Ultimate Authority: Being on Wikipedia means you no longer have to claim you are an innovative leader. The world's most trusted independent encyclopedia states it as a fact.
-
AI Dominance (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity): When a potential high-ticket client asks an AI engine, "Who is the leading [your industry] company?", the algorithm pulls from the most authoritative data available: Wikipedia. If you are there, you become the AI's preferred answer.
-
The Ultimate Investor & B2B Magnet: Investors and premium partners will Google you before they ever shake your hand. A Wikipedia page instantly triggers a Google Knowledge Panel, framing your company as an established, tier-one player. It builds instant trust, shortens negotiation cycles, and drives up your valuation.
Do You Actually Qualify For A Wikipedia page?
If anyone could buy their way onto Wikipedia, generative AI wouldn't use it as its absolute source of truth. The strict barrier to entry is exactly what makes your status unquestionable.
Successful Wikipedia page creation is not based on how much you spend on ads, but on strict editorial guidelines. To secure your brand's permanent place, you must pass the ultimate test: the "Golden rule of sources".
To be eligible for Wikipedia article creation, your digital footprint must prove:
-
The "2 to 3" Independent Source Rule: You need at least three news articles (or other reliable sources) that discuss the organization or boss at length. This acts as the absolute baseline for notability.
-
Non-Trivial, Significant Coverage: A quick name-drop or passing mention will not work. Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic.
-
Zero Paid Placements: Your organization's own website should not be used as a source, and neither should press releases, or blogs. The coverage must be entirely independent.